Metts v. Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Co.
This text of 573 So. 2d 1068 (Metts v. Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of final summary judgment in favor of the insurer in an action seeking uninsured motorist benefits. On the authority of Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Morrison, 574 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1990) (on rehearing), we reverse. The language of the policy in question is virtually identical to the language of the policy in Morrison. As in Morrison, coverage should be determined by the language of the policy and not by the statutory minimum requirements set forth by section 627.727, Florida Statutes (Supp.1984).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
573 So. 2d 1068, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1012, 1991 WL 15579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metts-v-southeastern-fidelity-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1991.