Mettler Instruments, Inc. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 667, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2317
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 25, 1968
DocketC.D. 3492
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 667 (Mettler Instruments, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mettler Instruments, Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 667, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2317 (cusc 1968).

Opinion

Maletz, Judge:

This protest has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States as to the items marked “A” and initialed HG (Commodity Specialist’s Initials) by Commodity Specialist H. Golub (Commodity Specialist’s Name) on the invoices covered by the subject protest and assessed with duty at 40% ad valorem under Item 708.27 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as follows:
1. That said merchandise consists of small glass discs, known as reticles, which have a mirror-like surface etched with lines and numbers and are mounted in metal frames.
2. That said reticles are chiefly used as integral and essential parts of analytical balances having a sensitivity of 5 centigrams or better, of the type provided for in Item 711.08 of the Tariff Schedules.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the protest listed on the attached schedule be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the items marked “A” as aforesaid.

This stipulated statement of the facts is sufficient to remove the present merchandise from the classification given by the collector and to establish the proper classification, as claimed by the plaintiffs, to be [668]*668under item 711.08 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as parts of balances, dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem.

To the extent indicated the protest is sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Cust. Ct. 667, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mettler-instruments-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1968.