Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution, Ltd.

Federal Circuit

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution, Ltd.

482 F. App'x 592

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 28, 2012·No. Nos. 2011-1572, 2012-1168, 2012-1169·Published

Opinion

[593] ON MOTION

DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Metso Minerals, Inc. moves for leave to file two separate response briefs or, in the alternative, to file an extended response brief of up to 23,000 words. Powerscreen International Distribution, Limited, Pow-erscreen New York, Inc., Emerald Equipment Systems. Inc. and Terex Corporation oppose the motion to file two separate response briefs but consent to the motion to file an extended response brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

It is Ordered that:

The motions are denied. Metso Minerals, Inc.’s brief, not to exceed 14,000 words, is due within 21 days of the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[593] ON MOTION

DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Metso Minerals, Inc. moves for leave to file two separate response briefs or, in the alternative, to file an extended response brief of up to 23,000 words. Powerscreen International Distribution, Limited, Pow-erscreen New York, Inc., Emerald Equipment Systems. Inc. and Terex Corporation oppose the motion to file two separate response briefs but consent to the motion to file an extended response brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

It is Ordered that:

The motions are denied. Metso Minerals, Inc.’s brief, not to exceed 14,000 words, is due within 21 days of the date of this order.

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution, Ltd., 482 F. App'x 592 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

482 F. App'x 592 (Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.