Mets Parking Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mets Parking Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.

88 A.D.2d 820, 451 N.Y.S.2d 379, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 A.D.2d 820 (Mets Parking Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mets Parking Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp., 88 A.D.2d 820, 451 N.Y.S.2d 379, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Ryp, J.), entered October 19, 1981 granting CPLR article 78 petitions to the extent of directing appellant to hold another public hearing, is unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent that decretal Paragraph Nos. 3 and 4 are reversed and vacated, and the petitions are dismissed, and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. The “public hearing” held by appellant, the New York State Urban Development Corporation, satisfied the legal requirements for such a hearing under section 16 (subd [2], par [c]) of the New York State Urban Development Corporation Act (L 1968, ch 174, as amd) and EDPL 201. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Ross, Silverman, Bloom and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Ryp, J.), entered October 19, 1981 granting CPLR article 78 petitions to the extent of directing appellant to hold another public hearing, is unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent that decretal Paragraph Nos. 3 and 4 are reversed and vacated, and the petitions are dismissed, and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. The “public hearing” held by appellant, the New York State Urban Development Corporation, satisfied the legal requirements for such a hearing under section 16 (subd [2], par [c]) of the New York State Urban Development Corporation Act (L 1968, ch 174, as amd) and EDPL 201. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Ross, Silverman, Bloom and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 820, 451 N.Y.S.2d 379, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mets-parking-inc-v-new-york-state-urban-development-corp-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack