Metros v. . Likas
This text of 42 S.E.2d 601 (Metros v. . Likas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe plaintiff sued on a promissory note in tbe sum of $500.00, wbicb be alleges was executed by tbe defendant, of wbicb be is now owner and bolder in due course, and wbicb is due and remains unpaid. Tbe defendant admits tbe execution of tbe note but alleges it was obtained from bim by tbe plaintiff upon a fraudulent representation, tbe particulars of wbicb are stated. Plaintiff demanded judgment on tbe pleadings, wbicb was refused, and be appealed.
It is not incumbent on tbe Court at tbis time to go into tbe merits of tbe controversy. Defendant bas made a sufficient showing to repel tbe present assault, and tbe order declining tbe motion for judgment on tbe pleadings is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E.2d 601, 227 N.C. 703, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metros-v-likas-nc-1947.