Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Nathan Johnson, Ernest Grey and Mary Callis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Nathan Johnson, Ernest Grey and Mary Callis

DecidedJanuary 5, 2012

Docket14-11-00651-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Nathan Johnson, Ernest Grey and Mary Callis (Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Nathan Johnson, Ernest Grey and Mary Callis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Nathan Johnson, Ernest Grey and Mary Callis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

January 5, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00651-CV V.

NATHAN JOHNSON, ERNEST GREY, AND MARY CALLIS, Appellees ____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Nathan Johnson, Ernest Grey, and Mary Callis, signed July 18, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI