Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority v. Mascioli
This text of 262 A.D.2d 537 (Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority v. Mascioli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover a security deposit, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Driscoll, J.), dated May 11, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment on the complaint and to dismiss the defendants’ counterclaims.
[538]*538Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, as it failed to demonstrate entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557).
The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Joy, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D.2d 537, 691 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-suburban-bus-authority-v-mascioli-nyappdiv-1999.