Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority v. Mascioli

262 A.D.2d 537, 691 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7019

This text of 262 A.D.2d 537 (Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority v. Mascioli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority v. Mascioli, 262 A.D.2d 537, 691 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover a security deposit, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Driscoll, J.), dated May 11, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment on the complaint and to dismiss the defendants’ counterclaims.

[538]*538Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, as it failed to demonstrate entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Joy, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D.2d 537, 691 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-suburban-bus-authority-v-mascioli-nyappdiv-1999.