Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. v. Davis
112 F. 633, 50 C.C.A. 402, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4123
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 13, 1901·No. No. 66·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Affirmed in open court on authority of Means v. Bank, 146 U. S. 620, 13 Sup. Ct. 186, 36 L. Ed. 1107; Isaacs v. U. S., 159 U. S. 487, 16 Sup. Ct. 51, 40 L. Ed. 229; Goldsby v. U. S., 160 U. S. 70, 16 Sup. Ct. 216, 40 L. Ed. 343.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. v. Davis, 112 F. 633, 50 C.C.A. 402, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4123 (2d Cir. 1901).
112 F. 633 (Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atlantic Dredging & Construction Co. v. Nashville Bridge Co.
57 F.2d 519 (Fifth Circuit, 1932)
American Hominy Co. v. Millikin Nat. Bank
273 F. 550 (S.D. Illinois, 1920)