METROPOLITAN RAILWAY COMPANY v. Church
This text of 174 U.S. 46 (METROPOLITAN RAILWAY COMPANY v. Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
METROPOLITAN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
CHURCH.
BRIGHTWOOD RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
O'NEAL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. D.W. Baker for Metropolitan Railway Co. Mr. Nathaniel Wilson was on his brief.
Mr. Ernest L. Schmidt for Church.
Mr. Henry P. Blair and Mr. Corcoran Thom, for Brightwood Railway Co., submitted on their brief.
Mr. Raymond A. Heiskell and Mr. M.J. Colbert for O'Neal.
Argued at the same time, the judgments of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, quashing writs of certiorari to set aside proceedings of a justice of the peace under similar circumstances, are likewise
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 U.S. 46, 19 S. Ct. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-railway-company-v-church-scotus-1899.