Metropolitan Property v. Tu Shang Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Metropolitan Property v. Tu Shang Lee

199 A.D.2d 322, 605 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11856

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 322 (Metropolitan Property v. Tu Shang Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metropolitan Property v. Tu Shang Lee, 199 A.D.2d 322, 605 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated September 24, 1991, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents Hartford Accident and Indemnity Insurance Company and Country-Wide Insurance Company, appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that Country-Wide Insurance Company presented sufficient evidence to rebut the petitioner’s prima facie showing that the offending vehicle was insured by it at the time of the accident. Accordingly, the petition to stay arbitration was properly denied (see, Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. [Dye—Metropolitan Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co.J 170 AD2d 683). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated September 24, 1991, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents Hartford Accident and Indemnity Insurance Company and Country-Wide Insurance Company, appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that Country-Wide Insurance Company presented sufficient evidence to rebut the petitioner’s prima facie showing that the offending vehicle was insured by it at the time of the accident. Accordingly, the petition to stay arbitration was properly denied (see, Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. [Dye—Metropolitan Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co.J 170 AD2d 683). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 322, 605 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-property-v-tu-shang-lee-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack