Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v.Pangilinan
This text of 215 A.D.2d 543 (Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v.Pangilinan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend and indemnify the defendants Fernando Pangilinan and Araceli Pangilinan on behalf of the defendant Michelle Pangilinan in an action commenced against them by the defendants Malini Balakrishnan and Elita Balakrishnan, the Balakrishnans appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated January 28, 1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The injuries sustained by the appellant Malini Balakrishnan when she was punched in the nose by the defendant Michelle Pangilinan were, as a matter of law, "reasonably expected or intended” within the meaning of the insurance policy exclusion (see, Allstate Ins. Co. v Mugavero, 79 NY2d 153, 161). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 A.D.2d 543, 627 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-property-casualty-insurance-vpangilinan-nyappdiv-1995.