Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Holland

463 F. App'x 188
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2012
DocketNo. 11-1372
StatusPublished

This text of 463 F. App'x 188 (Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Holland, 463 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter J. Holland, Jr. appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Appellee on its claim for a declaratory judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Metro. Prop. and Cas. Ins. Co. v. McKaughan, No. 1:10-cv-00690-WMN, 2011 WL 977870 (D.Md. Mar. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
463 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-property-casualty-insurance-v-holland-ca4-2012.