Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. Merchants & Manufacturers Bank

25 A. 764, 155 Pa. 20, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1170
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 3, 1893
DocketAppeal, No. 92
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 25 A. 764 (Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. Merchants & Manufacturers Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. Merchants & Manufacturers Bank, 25 A. 764, 155 Pa. 20, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1170 (Pa. 1893).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We need not discuss the question, whether the agreement by the defendant bank to pay the note for §714.14 held by the [22]*22plaintiff against the Falls Wire Manufacturing Company, not being in writing, is within the statute of frauds.

The referee has decided the case upon another ground which we think sufficient, viz.: “ That the plaintiff released defendant from its promise to pay said note on its settlement with the Falls Wire Manufacturing Company.”

The specifications of error are to the findings of facts by the referee. They do not require discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kiski Area School District v. Mid-State Surety Corp.
967 A.2d 368 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
Knecht, Inc. v. United Pacific Insurance Company
860 F.2d 74 (Third Circuit, 1988)
Union National Bank v. Farmers & Mechanics National Bank
114 A. 506 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A. 764, 155 Pa. 20, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-nat-bank-v-merchants-manufacturers-bank-pa-1893.