Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Third Circuit

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

138 F. App'x 479

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 8, 2005·No. No. 04-2829·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Having considered the record and the parties’ briefs, we will affirm, essentially for the reasons stated by the District Court in its order dated May 27, 2004. Specifically, we find the injunction against the state court proceedings to be justified under the “protect or effectuate its judgments” exception to the Anti-Injunction Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 2283.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Having considered the record and the parties’ briefs, we will affirm, essentially for the reasons stated by the District Court in its order dated May 27, 2004. Specifically, we find the injunction against the state court proceedings to be justified under the “protect or effectuate its judgments” exception to the Anti-Injunction Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 2283.

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 138 F. App'x 479 (3d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

138 F. App'x 479 (Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related