Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Kramarsky
666 F.2d 26, 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1793
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 24, 1981·No. No. 19, Docket 80-7185·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
For the reasons stated today in our opinion on rehearing in Delta Airlines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 666 F.2d 21, we vacate our original decision on this appeal, reported at 650 F.2d 1309, holding that § 514(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1144(a) (1976), did not preempt New York’s Human Rights Law, N.Y.Exec.Law § 296 (McKinney 1972 & Supp. 1980-1981).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Kramarsky, 666 F.2d 26, 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1793 (2d Cir. 1981).
666 F.2d 26 (Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Kramarsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1793, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,844 Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Werner H. Kramarsky, as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, the New York State Division of Human Rights, and the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board
666 F.2d 26 (Second Circuit, 1981)