Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Hoffman

222 P.2d 620, 122 Colo. 431, 1950 Colo. LEXIS 264

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedSeptember 18, 1950

DocketNo. 16,363

StatusPublished

This text of 222 P.2d 620 (Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Hoffman, 222 P.2d 620, 122 Colo. 431, 1950 Colo. LEXIS 264 (Colo. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Chief Justice Hilliard did not participate in the consideration of this cause.

Mr. Justice Stone, Mr. Justice Hays and Mr. Justice Moore are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas, Mr. Justice Jackson, Mr. Justice Alter and Mr. Justice Holland think that it should be reversed.

The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed by operation of law because of an evenly divided court, and no [432]*432good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court. (Rule 118 (f), R.C.P. Colo.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Mr. Chief Justice Hilliard did not participate in the consideration of this cause.

Mr. Justice Stone, Mr. Justice Hays and Mr. Justice Moore are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas, Mr. Justice Jackson, Mr. Justice Alter and Mr. Justice Holland think that it should be reversed.

The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed by operation of law because of an evenly divided court, and no [432]*432good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court. (Rule 118 (f), R.C.P. Colo.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 P.2d 620, 122 Colo. 431, 1950 Colo. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-life-insurance-v-hoffman-colo-1950.