Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Haggerty
158 A. 524, 109 N.J. Eq. 663, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 868
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the conclusions of Vice-Chancellor Eielder.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Haggerty, 158 A. 524, 109 N.J. Eq. 663, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 868 (N.J. 1932).
158 A. 524 (Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Haggerty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gerhard v. the Travelers Ins. Co.
258 A.2d 724 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Woolf
42 A.2d 866 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
In Re Chryssikos
39 A.2d 104 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1944)
John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Heidrick
38 A.2d 442 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)