Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Bendheim

59 N.Y.S. 793
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 20, 1898·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BISCHOFF, J.

The motion by the referee for additional compensation for services rendered by Mm as. referee to sell under a judgment of foreclosure and sale cannot be granted. The application is founded solely upon the fact that the property was sold for a sum excessive of $10,000, but the operation of section 3297 of the Code of Civil Procedure, providing for extra compensation in such cases, is to be extended only to a case where the referee has actually received more than $10,000 in cash upon the sale. Hosmer v. Gans, 14 Misc. Rep. 229, 32 N. Y. Supp. 471. Here the greater part of the purchase money was paid by delivery of a bond and mortgage, and the referee received but $2,200, and became accountable for no more in the course of the performance of .his duties.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Bendheim, 59 N.Y.S. 793 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).

59 N.Y.S. 793 (Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Bendheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osborn v. DeGraaf Building Corp.
236 A.D. 172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Dime Sav. Bank v. Pettit
59 N.Y.S. 794 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)