Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Skinner III

District Court, E.D. Michigan·Decided April 17, 2025·No. 4:23-cv-12969·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Case No. 23-12969 COMPANY, F. Kay Behm Plaintiff, United States District Judge v. Kimberly G. Altman JOSEPH SKINNER III, et al, United States Magistrate Judge

Defendants. ____________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FEBRUARY 21, 2025 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND MARCH 24, 2025 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF Nos. 21, 29), GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF Nos. 18, 28), and ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS JOSEPH SKINNER, III AND JOLEEN SKINNER

Currently before the court are Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman’s February 21, 2025 and March 24, 2025 Reports and Recommendations. (ECF Nos. 21, 29). Magistrate Judge Altman recommends granting the motions for default judgment against Defendants Joseph Skinner, III (ECF No. 18) and Joleen Skinner (ECF No. 28). The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. No objections have been filed. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court

nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Reports and Recommendations (ECF No. 21, 29) and GRANTS Plaintiff’s motions for default

judgment (ECF Nos. 18, 28) against Defendants Joseph Skinner, III and Jolene Skinner. Accordingly, the court ENTERS default judgments against Joseph Skinner, III and Joleen Skinner as follows:

1. Joseph Skinner, III is not entitled to any share of the judgment proceeds in the underlying interpleader action; and MetLife, General Motors, and the General Motors Plan are discharged from further liability to Joseph Skinner, III

relating to the life insurance benefits at issue in the underlying interpleader action.

2. Joleen Skinner is not entitled to any share of the judgment proceeds in the underlying interpleader action; and MetLife, General Motors, and the General Motors Plan are discharged from further liability to Joleen Skinner

relating to the life insurance benefits at issue in the underlying interpleader action. SO ORDERED.

Date: April 17, 2025 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Skinner III, (E.D. Mich. 2025).

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Skinner III (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Skinner III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)