Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Urback
46 A.2d 905, 138 N.J. Eq. 108
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, filed in the Court of Chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Heiier, Perskie, Oliphant, Dill, McGeehan, JJ. 7.
For reversal — Parker, Donges, Wells, Rafferty, JJ. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Urback, 46 A.2d 905, 138 N.J. Eq. 108 (N.J. 1946).
46 A.2d 905 (Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Urback) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The COLONIAL LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA v. Mazur
96 A.2d 95 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Glasser v. Essaness Theatres Corp.
111 N.E.2d 124 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1953)
Glasser v. Essaness Theatres Corp.
104 N.E.2d 510 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1952)
Bogda v. Chevrolet-Bloomfield Div., GM Corp.
73 A.2d 735 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Sinett
64 A.2d 639 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
164 F.2d 660 (Third Circuit, 1947)