Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Lane

258 S.W.3d 67, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 661, 2008 WL 2038425
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 13, 2008·No. ED 89948·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angela Jeans (‘Wife”) appeals from a judgment in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County finding that Sylvia Young, Angel *68 Lane and Sharmae Young are the beneficiaries of Emmet Young’s (“Decedent”) $33,000 life insurance policy. In her sole point on appeal, Wife argues that the trial court erred in finding that Decedent did not intend to change his beneficiary because this finding was against the weight of the evidence. More specifically she argues that Decedent substantially complied with the terms of the policy and “had done everything possible to effect such a change.”

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Lane, 258 S.W.3d 67, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 661, 2008 WL 2038425 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

258 S.W.3d 67 (Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.