Metropolitan Life, Ins. Co. v. Erdei

Ohio Supreme Court

Metropolitan Life, Ins. Co. v. Erdei

186 N.E. 403, 126 Ohio St. 598, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 598, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 408

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 5, 1933

Docket23756

StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.E. 403 (Metropolitan Life, Ins. Co. v. Erdei) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metropolitan Life, Ins. Co. v. Erdei, 186 N.E. 403, 126 Ohio St. 598, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 598, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 408 (Ohio 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

This matter coming on for review upon the certification of the judges of the Court of Appeals of the Eighth District, having found that their judgment affirming the judgment of the municipal court is in conflict with the judgment on the same question rendered by the Court of Appeals of Mahoning county in the case of Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. King, reported in 34 Ohio Law Reporter, 370, was argued by counsel and submitted to the court; upon consideration thereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the Court of Appeals of • the Eighth District be and the same hereby is affirmed (two judges not participating, three judges for reversal and two judges for affirmance), there being an insufficient number of judges concurring to reverse said judgment, and no declaration of law can be made.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephenson and Matthias, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., and Kinkade, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter coming on for review upon the certification of the judges of the Court of Appeals of the Eighth District, having found that their judgment affirming the judgment of the municipal court is in conflict with the judgment on the same question rendered by the Court of Appeals of Mahoning county in the case of Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. King, reported in 34 Ohio Law Reporter, 370, was argued by counsel and submitted to the court; upon consideration thereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the Court of Appeals of • the Eighth District be and the same hereby is affirmed (two judges not participating, three judges for reversal and two judges for affirmance), there being an insufficient number of judges concurring to reverse said judgment, and no declaration of law can be made.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephenson and Matthias, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., and Kinkade, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 N.E. 403, 126 Ohio St. 598, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 598, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-life-ins-co-v-erdei-ohio-1933.