Metropolitan Industries, Inc. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 807, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1369

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise covered by the foregoing protests, described as sprinklers, are, in fact, hose nozzles and following the rationale of United States v. Lipman’s (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.