Metropolitan Dade County v. Marino
This text of 526 So. 2d 1050 (Metropolitan Dade County v. Marino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Concluding that the trial court’s instruction to disregard the arguably inadmissible testimony sufficiently cured any prejudice that may have resulted from its admission, and that, therefore, a mistrial was not warranted, we affirm the judgment under review. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Guthrie, 321 So.2d 116 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Compania Dominicana de Aviacion v. Knapp, 251 So.2d 18 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
526 So. 2d 1050, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2555, 1988 WL 62007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-dade-county-v-marino-fladistctapp-1988.