Metropolitan Dade County v. Marino

526 So. 2d 1050, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2555, 1988 WL 62007
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 21, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2512
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 526 So. 2d 1050 (Metropolitan Dade County v. Marino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metropolitan Dade County v. Marino, 526 So. 2d 1050, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2555, 1988 WL 62007 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Concluding that the trial court’s instruction to disregard the arguably inadmissible testimony sufficiently cured any prejudice that may have resulted from its admission, and that, therefore, a mistrial was not warranted, we affirm the judgment under review. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Guthrie, 321 So.2d 116 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Compania Dominicana de Aviacion v. Knapp, 251 So.2d 18 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanchez v. Bengochea
573 So. 2d 992 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 So. 2d 1050, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2555, 1988 WL 62007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-dade-county-v-marino-fladistctapp-1988.