Metropolitan Dade County v. Funches

606 So. 2d 514, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11335, 1992 WL 312768
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 29, 1992·No. No. 92-471·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The employer/carrier appeal an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims awarding claimant benefits based upon a finding that claimant’s liver disease and subsequent liver transplant, and all other resulting problems, are causally related to his employment in a print shop. We affirm upon the premise that the record supports recovery under an exposure theory.1 The finding in the order that claimant’s condition additionally constitutes an occupational disease, which is unsupported by the record, is stricken and under the circumstances constitutes harmless error.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metropolitan Dade County v. Funches, 606 So. 2d 514, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11335, 1992 WL 312768 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

606 So. 2d 514 (Metropolitan Dade County v. Funches) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Festa v. Teleflex, Inc.
382 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Lake v. Irwin Yacht & Marine Corp.
398 So. 2d 902 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)