Metropolitan Dade County v. Evans

474 So. 2d 392, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1992, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15556
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 20, 1985
Docket85-568
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 474 So. 2d 392 (Metropolitan Dade County v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metropolitan Dade County v. Evans, 474 So. 2d 392, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1992, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15556 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

474 So.2d 392 (1985)

METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellant,
v.
Herbert EVANS, Jr., Appellee.

No. 85-568.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 20, 1985.

*393 Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty. and Roy Wood, Asst. County Atty., for appellant.

Richard L. Katz, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The trial court held that the appellee, a police officer who was joined as a co-defendant with his employer, Dade County, in a civil damage action arising out of his official duties, had "prevailed" when the case against him was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a settlement effected by the county, and that he was therefore entitled to reimbursement of his attorney's fees under section 111.07, Florida Statutes (1983).[1] See generally, Nuzum v. Valdes, 407 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Since the dismissal operated to terminate finally any proceeding against the officer, see Sacks v. Rickles, 155 So.2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963), and, as we held in State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Hall, 409 So.2d 193, 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), "a merits determination is not a prerequisite to an award of attorney's fees where the statute provides that they will inure to the party who prevails", the order is

Affirmed.

NOTES

[1] The section provides:

Any agency of the state, or any county, municipality, or political subdivision of the state, is authorized to provide an attorney to defend any civil action arising from a complaint for damages or injury suffered as a result of any act or omission of action of any of its officers, employees, or agents for an act or omission arising out of and in the scope of his employment or function... . If any agency of the state or any county, municipality, or political subdivision of the state is authorized pursuant to this section to provide an attorney to defend a civil action arising from a complaint for damages or injury suffered as a result of any act or omission of action of any of its officers, employees, or agents and fails to provide such attorney, such agency, county, municipality, or political subdivision shall reimburse any such defendant who prevails in the action for court costs and reasonable attorney's fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miami-Dade County v. Phillips
963 So. 2d 851 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Alhambra Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Asad
943 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Padow v. KNOLLWOOD CLUB ASSOCIATION, INC.
839 So. 2d 744 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Boca Airport, Inc. v. Roll-N-Roaster of Boca, Inc.
690 So. 2d 640 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Thornber v. City of Ft. Walton Beach
568 So. 2d 914 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
City of Fort Walton Beach v. Grant
544 So. 2d 230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Quijano ex rel. Quijano v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund
520 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Simmons v. Schimmel
476 So. 2d 1342 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 So. 2d 392, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1992, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-dade-county-v-evans-fladistctapp-1985.