Metropolitan Dade County v. Abraham

539 So. 2d 1172, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 679, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1305, 1989 WL 21481
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2142
StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 1172 (Metropolitan Dade County v. Abraham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metropolitan Dade County v. Abraham, 539 So. 2d 1172, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 679, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1305, 1989 WL 21481 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for a writ of certiorari brought by Metropolitan Dade County which seeks review of a circuit court order awarding attorney’s fees to the respondent Lane Abraham for representing a parent before this court on appeal from an adverse order entered in a juvenile dependency proceeding.

Without reaching any of the issues raised by Metropolitan Dade County in its petition, we quash the order under review for being prematurely entered. The appeal in which Mr. Abraham is representing the aforesaid parent is still pending before this court and no final decision has been rendered in the case. It is elementary that no right to attorney’s fees on appeal accrues until the appellate court renders a decision in the subject appeal. See Gieseke v. Gieseke, 499 So.2d 839, 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); DiTeodoro v. Lazy Dolphin Dev. Co., 432 So.2d 625, 626 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Mullins v. Mullins, 342 So.2d 83, 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

This decision, however, shall be without prejudice to the respondent Lane Abraham applying to the circuit court below for appellate attorney’s fees at any time after this court renders a final decision in the above-stated appeal. We express no views, however, as to Mr. Abraham’s entitlement to such attorney’s fees, nor as to the amount of such fees, if awardable.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, and the order under review is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mullins v. Mullins
342 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Di Teodoro v. Lazy Dolphin Dev. Co.
432 So. 2d 625 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Gieseke v. Gieseke
499 So. 2d 839 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 1172, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 679, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1305, 1989 WL 21481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-dade-county-v-abraham-fladistctapp-1989.