Metropolitan Dade County Transit Authority v. Edwards

247 So. 2d 775, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6744
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 18, 1971
DocketNo. 70-992
StatusPublished

This text of 247 So. 2d 775 (Metropolitan Dade County Transit Authority v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metropolitan Dade County Transit Authority v. Edwards, 247 So. 2d 775, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6744 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant is a workman’s compensation self-insurer; as such it occupies the position of insurance carrier in this litigation. This appeal is from an order denying equitable subrogation pursuant to F.S. § 440.39, F.S.A.

The trial judge assigned an incorrect ground for his decision. We find, however, that the order appealed should be affirmed upon a different ground, cf. Berkman v. Miami National Bank, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 535. Under authority of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Harb, Fla.App.1964, 170 So.2d 54, the trial court correctly denied equitable subro-gation in this case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Harb
170 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Berkman v. Miami National Bank
143 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 So. 2d 775, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-dade-county-transit-authority-v-edwards-fladistctapp-1971.