Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Crenshaw
This text of 161 S.E. 649 (Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Crenshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a claim under the 'workmen’s compensation act, by a widow, for compensation for the death of her husband. Upon the hearing before a single commissioner the evidence adduced, together with the legal inferences and deductions arising therefrom, irrespective of the alleged hearsay evidence admitted over the objections of the defendants (the testimony of a witness that the deceased, a few days before his death, stated that the abrasions on his hand were caused by handling boxes or barrels where he worked), authorized the following findings of fact: (1) that the de&th of the deceased was due to a disease called tularemia, which he contracted by handling and dressing dead rabbits in the course of his employment while he had abrasions on his hands, the germs of the disease entering his blood stream through the abrasions; (2) that the abrasions on his hands were caused by handling heavy boxes or barrels in the course of his employment, and that the receiving of such abrasions was an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment; (3) that the disease (tularemia) resulted naturally and unavoidably from the above-stated accident.
It follows from the foregoing rulings that the award of the industrial commission in favor of the claimant was authorized, and that it was properly affirmed by the judge of the superior court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 S.E. 649, 44 Ga. App. 354, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-casualty-insurance-v-crenshaw-gactapp-1931.