Metropolitan Bank v. Commercial Soap, Candle & Starch Manufactory
This text of 20 So. 889 (Metropolitan Bank v. Commercial Soap, Candle & Starch Manufactory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Motion to Dismiss.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is an appeal from a judgment appointing a re[1384]*1384ceiver. A suspensive appeal was taken. The motion to dismiss is on the ground that the judgment appealed from was one which should be provisionally executed, notwithstanding the appeal, and therefore no suspensive appeal would lie therefrom.
Some judgments, notwithstanding the suspensive appeal, are provisionally executed. These are named in Art. 580, paragraphs 1 and 2, C. P., and Art. 1059, C. P.
The appeal for the appointment of a receiver to a corporation is not enumerated, and is therefore excluded.
The motion to dismiss is therefore overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 So. 889, 48 La. Ann. 1383, 1896 La. LEXIS 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-bank-v-commercial-soap-candle-starch-manufactory-la-1896.