Metropolitan Ass'n. of Employment Agents v. Gourdine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Metropolitan Ass'n. of Employment Agents v. Gourdine

108 A.D.2d 633, 485 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42981

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 108 A.D.2d 633 (Metropolitan Ass'n. of Employment Agents v. Gourdine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metropolitan Ass'n. of Employment Agents v. Gourdine, 108 A.D.2d 633, 485 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Saxe, J.), entered December 9, 1983, which granted petitioner’s application and declared regulations 10 and 11 of the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs void, affirmed, without costs.

In affirming the judgment of Special Term we note that we do so solely because the Commissioner failed to publish the proposed regulations in the City Record on two separate occasions, as required by New York City Charter § 1105 (b). Contrary to the conclusion reached at Special Term, we do not believe that the adoption of these regulations was beyond the regulatory power of the Commissioner. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Bloom and Kassal, JJ. [120 Mise 2d 290.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Saxe, J.), entered December 9, 1983, which granted petitioner’s application and declared regulations 10 and 11 of the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs void, affirmed, without costs.

In affirming the judgment of Special Term we note that we do so solely because the Commissioner failed to publish the proposed regulations in the City Record on two separate occasions, as required by New York City Charter § 1105 (b). Contrary to the conclusion reached at Special Term, we do not believe that the adoption of these regulations was beyond the regulatory power of the Commissioner. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Bloom and Kassal, JJ. [120 Mise 2d 290.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.D.2d 633, 485 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-assn-of-employment-agents-v-gourdine-nyappdiv-1985.