Metropolitan Arts & Antiques Pavilion, Ltd. v. Rogers Marvel Architects, P. L. L. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Metropolitan Arts & Antiques Pavilion, Ltd. v. Rogers Marvel Architects, P. L. L. C.

287 A.D.2d 372, 731 N.Y.S.2d 613, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9920

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about April 2, 2001, which granted defendant’s motion to stay the action and compel arbitration under the subject agreement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly enforced the arbitration clause contained in the contract which was expressly incorporated into the parties’ executed letter agreement (see, Matter of Bay Anesthesia [Zegelstein], 194 AD2d 397; Jet Set Invs. v Dubl-Duck Imports, 165 AD2d 703). There is no requirement that a written agreement to arbitrate be signed by a party against whom arbitration is sought, as long as there is an express, unequivocal agreement to arbitrate (see, Rudolph & Beer v Roberts, 260 AD2d 274, 276). We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about April 2, 2001, which granted defendant’s motion to stay the action and compel arbitration under the subject agreement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly enforced the arbitration clause contained in the contract which was expressly incorporated into the parties’ executed letter agreement (see, Matter of Bay Anesthesia [Zegelstein], 194 AD2d 397; Jet Set Invs. v Dubl-Duck Imports, 165 AD2d 703). There is no requirement that a written agreement to arbitrate be signed by a party against whom arbitration is sought, as long as there is an express, unequivocal agreement to arbitrate (see, Rudolph & Beer v Roberts, 260 AD2d 274, 276). We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Metropolitan Arts & Antiques Pavilion, Ltd. v. Rogers Marvel Architects, P. L. L. C., 287 A.D.2d 372, 731 N.Y.S.2d 613, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

287 A.D.2d 372 (Metropolitan Arts & Antiques Pavilion, Ltd. v. Rogers Marvel Architects, P. L. L. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related