Metro St. Louis Sewer District v. Transamerica Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Metro St. Louis Sewer District v. Transamerica Insurance Co.

878 S.W.2d 521, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1129

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1994·No. No. 64268·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondents’ motion to dismiss and respondent Unnerstall Contracting Company’s motion for attorney’s fee are denied. Appellant appeals from a judgment claiming the trial court erred.

We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal file and transcript. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondents’ motion to dismiss and respondent Unnerstall Contracting Company’s motion for attorney’s fee are denied. Appellant appeals from a judgment claiming the trial court erred.

We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal file and transcript. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Metro St. Louis Sewer District v. Transamerica Insurance Co., 878 S.W.2d 521, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1129 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

878 S.W.2d 521 (Metro St. Louis Sewer District v. Transamerica Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.