Metro Sports Sales, Inc. v. Spenco Medical Corp.

252 A.D.2d 484, 676 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8010
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 6, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 252 A.D.2d 484 (Metro Sports Sales, Inc. v. Spenco Medical Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metro Sports Sales, Inc. v. Spenco Medical Corp., 252 A.D.2d 484, 676 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated July 8, 1997, as granted the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment limiting the damages to be recovered on the plaintiff’s first and third causes of action to a maximum of $18,035.71.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The parties’ agreement was duly terminated by written notice which the plaintiff acknowledged. Pursuant to the terms of their agreement, the commissions due the plaintiff were limited to only the orders it sold as they were shipped. The plaintiff’s unsupported assertions to the contrary did not raise a material issue of fact in this regard and thus were insufficient to defeat [485]*485the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Greenman Constr. Corp. v Incorporated Vil. of Northport, 209 AD2d 565).

The plaintiffs remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, without merit (see, Croce v Marisi, 234 AD2d 333). Pizzuto, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.J. Hyland, Inc. v. Love Family Sports, LLC
102 A.D.3d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Production Products Co. v. Vision Corp.
270 A.D.2d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D.2d 484, 676 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metro-sports-sales-inc-v-spenco-medical-corp-nyappdiv-1998.