Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Metro Sales Co. v. Greenwald

Metro Sales Co. v. Greenwald

215 So. 2d 762, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4862
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 25, 1968
DocketNo. 1080
StatusPublished

This text of 215 So. 2d 762 (Metro Sales Co. v. Greenwald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metro Sales Co. v. Greenwald, 215 So. 2d 762, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4862 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

The amended complaint alleged a breach of a contract to pay certain money payable in Broward County. The cause of action thereby accrued in Broward County and the court was correct in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss for improper venue. See Croker v. Powell, 1934, 115 Fla. 733, 156 So. 146; Producers Supply, Inc. v. Harz, 1942, 149 Fla. 594, 6 So.2d 375; Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc., FÍa.App.1966, 191 So.2d 480; Saf-T-Clean, Inc. v. Martin-Marietta Corporation, Fla.1967, 197 So.2d8; Section 47.051, F.S.1967, F.S.A.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc.
191 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Croker v. Powell
156 So. 146 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Producers Supply, Inc. v. Harz
6 So. 2d 375 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 So. 2d 762, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metro-sales-co-v-greenwald-fladistctapp-1968.