Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Bally Louisiana, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Bally Louisiana, Inc.

695 So. 2d 1336, 1997 La. LEXIS 2083, 1997 WL 381137

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 30, 1997

DocketNo. 97-CC-1492

StatusPublished

This text of 695 So. 2d 1336 (Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Bally Louisiana, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Bally Louisiana, Inc., 695 So. 2d 1336, 1997 La. LEXIS 2083, 1997 WL 381137 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinions

In re Bally Louisiana Inc.; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “K”, No. 97-05403; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97CW-0892.

| iGranted. Under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in denying relator’s motion for a suspensive appeal as to the mandatory portion of the preliminary injunction. Accordingly, relator is granted a suspensive appeal as to the mandatory portion of the preliminary injunction, conditioned upon the posting of a suspensive appeal bond in an amount to be fixed by the trial court and to be posted within five days of the fixing of the bond by the trial court. As to the prohibitory portion of the injunction, the devolutive appeal is maintained, but any proceedings with regard to relator’s demand for arbitration are stayed pending the finality of the appeal. The suspensive appeal and devolutive appeal are ordered consolidated in the court of appeal, and should be heard by that court in an expedited maimer.

CALOGERO, J., not on panel. JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ and the stay, for reasons assigned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bally Louisiana Inc.; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “K”, No. 97-05403; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97CW-0892.

| iGranted. Under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in denying relator’s motion for a suspensive appeal as to the mandatory portion of the preliminary injunction. Accordingly, relator is granted a suspensive appeal as to the mandatory portion of the preliminary injunction, conditioned upon the posting of a suspensive appeal bond in an amount to be fixed by the trial court and to be posted within five days of the fixing of the bond by the trial court. As to the prohibitory portion of the injunction, the devolutive appeal is maintained, but any proceedings with regard to relator’s demand for arbitration are stayed pending the finality of the appeal. The suspensive appeal and devolutive appeal are ordered consolidated in the court of appeal, and should be heard by that court in an expedited maimer.

CALOGERO, J., not on panel. JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ and the stay, for reasons assigned.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

695 So. 2d 1336, 1997 La. LEXIS 2083, 1997 WL 381137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metro-riverboat-associates-inc-v-bally-louisiana-inc-la-1997.