Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distributing Corp. v. Maxwell

209 N.C. 47
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 11, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

It appears on tbe face of tbe complaint tbat tbe tax in question was levied and collected under tbe Eevenue Act of 1933; tbat plaintiff did not observe tbe statutory method provided for testing tbe validity of any tax paid thereunder; and tbat tbe allegation of payment under compulsion is a mere conclusion of tbe pleader unsupported by tbe facts. This renders tbe complaint bad as against a demurrer. Bunn v. Maxwell, 199 N. C., 557, 155 S. E., 250; Mfg. Co. v. Comrs. of Pender, 196 N. C., 744, 147 S. E., 284; Rotan v. State, 195 N. C., 291, 141 S. E., 733; Maxwell v. Hinsdale, 207 N. C., 37, 175 S. E., 847.

Tbe demurrer admits facts properly pleaded, but not inferences or conclusions of law. Phifer v. Berry, 202 N. C., 388, 163 S. E., 119. Tbe action was properly dismissed.

Affirmed.

Devin, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distributing Corp. v. Maxwell, 209 N.C. 47 (N.C. 1935).

209 N.C. 47 (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distributing Corp. v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cox v. Pitt County Transportation Company
129 S.E.2d 589 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)