Metoyer v. Metoyer
235 N.E.2d 882, 92 Ill. App. 2d 32
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 1, 1968
DocketGen. No. 51,795
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 235 N.E.2d 882 (Metoyer v. Metoyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Metoyer v. Metoyer, 235 N.E.2d 882, 92 Ill. App. 2d 32 (Ill. Ct. App. 1968).
Opinion
Joseph Metoyer, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Noralie Metoyer, Defendant-Appellee.
Illinois Appellate Court First District, Third Division.
*33 Robert Reiff, of Cicero (Francis X. Riley, of counsel), for appellant.
Marshall Patner, Benjamin Bromberg, and Thomas Mack, of Chicago (Leslie R. Seeligson, of counsel), for appellee.
(Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion by JUSTICE SCHWARTZ.
Judgment affirmed.
Not to be published in full.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bilsky v. Bilsky
309 N.E.2d 697 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)
Haring v. Haring
260 N.E.2d 396 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 N.E.2d 882, 92 Ill. App. 2d 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metoyer-v-metoyer-illappct-1968.