Metoyer v. Metoyer

235 N.E.2d 882, 92 Ill. App. 2d 32

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided February 1, 1968·No. Gen. No. 51,795·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

92 Ill. App.2d 32 (1968) 235 N.E.2d 882

Joseph Metoyer, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Noralie Metoyer, Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 51,795.

Illinois Appellate Court First District, Third Division.

February 1, 1968.

*33 Robert Reiff, of Cicero (Francis X. Riley, of counsel), for appellant.

Marshall Patner, Benjamin Bromberg, and Thomas Mack, of Chicago (Leslie R. Seeligson, of counsel), for appellee.

(Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion by JUSTICE SCHWARTZ.

Judgment affirmed.

Not to be published in full.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

92 Ill. App.2d 32 (1968) 235 N.E.2d 882

Joseph Metoyer, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Noralie Metoyer, Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 51,795.

Illinois Appellate Court First District, Third Division.

February 1, 1968.

*33 Robert Reiff, of Cicero (Francis X. Riley, of counsel), for appellant.

Marshall Patner, Benjamin Bromberg, and Thomas Mack, of Chicago (Leslie R. Seeligson, of counsel), for appellee.

(Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion by JUSTICE SCHWARTZ.

Judgment affirmed.

Not to be published in full.

Metoyer v. Metoyer, 235 N.E.2d 882, 92 Ill. App. 2d 32 (Ill. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

235 N.E.2d 882 (Metoyer v. Metoyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bilsky v. Bilsky

309 N.E.2d 697 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)

Haring v. Haring

260 N.E.2d 396 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1970)