Metler v. Metler
69 P. 9, 28 Wash. 734, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 543
This text of 69 P. 9 (Metler v. Metler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Metler v. Metler, 69 P. 9, 28 Wash. 734, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 543 (Wash. 1902).
Opinion
— The appeal in this case is from an order vacating a judgment, and motion is made by the respondent to dismiss the appeal for the reason that such order is not an appealable order. Under the rule announced in Freeman v. Ambrose, 12 Wash. 1 (40 Pac. 381), and Nelson v. Denny, 26 Wash. 327 (67 Pac. 78), the motion must be sustained and the appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chehalis Coal Co. v. Laisure
166 P. 1158 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)
Watson v. Sinclaire
44 Wash. 119 (Washington Supreme Court, 1906)
Tatum v. Geist
82 P. 902 (Washington Supreme Court, 1905)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
69 P. 9, 28 Wash. 734, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metler-v-metler-wash-1902.