Methvin v. Loyd

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Methvin v. Loyd

617 So. 2d 603, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 1426, 1993 WL 105623

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 7, 1993

DocketNo. 92-596

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 617 So. 2d 603 (Methvin v. Loyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Methvin v. Loyd, 617 So. 2d 603, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 1426, 1993 WL 105623 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

YELVERTON, Judge.

For the reasons given in Cagle v. Succession of Loyd, 617 So.2d 592 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), handed down this date, the judgment in favor of Jack Methvin, Nancy Methvin, Sam Methvin, Carolyn Methvin and the Methvin Partnership and against defendant, the Succession of Jess Loyd, Jr., in the amount of $5,069,086, with legal interest from date of judicial demand until paid, and costs below and on appeal, is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

YELVERTON, Judge.

For the reasons given in Cagle v. Succession of Loyd, 617 So.2d 592 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), handed down this date, the judgment in favor of Jack Methvin, Nancy Methvin, Sam Methvin, Carolyn Methvin and the Methvin Partnership and against defendant, the Succession of Jess Loyd, Jr., in the amount of $5,069,086, with legal interest from date of judicial demand until paid, and costs below and on appeal, is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

617 So. 2d 603, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 1426, 1993 WL 105623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/methvin-v-loyd-lactapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack