Methuen Co. v. Hayes
33 Me. 169
This text of 33 Me. 169 (Methuen Co. v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Methuen Co. v. Hayes, 33 Me. 169 (Me. 1851).
Opinion
— The agency of Davis was lawfully proved. There was no evidence that it was a limited agency. In the absence of such evidence, the agency is to be considered a general one. Such an agency includes the authority to commence and prosecute suits.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roane v. Union Pac. Life Ins.
135 P. 892 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1913)
Aerne v. Gostlow
118 P. 277 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1911)
Leo Austrian & Co. v. Springer
54 N.W. 50 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1892)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 Me. 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/methuen-co-v-hayes-me-1851.