Methodist Medical Center v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Methodist Medical Center v. State

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 871, 1983 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 113

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 4, 1983

DocketNo. 82-CC-2617

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 871 (Methodist Medical Center v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Methodist Medical Center v. State, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 871, 1983 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 113 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Roe, C.J.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Respondent’s motion to dismiss and the Court being duly advised in the premises:

Finds, that the amount the Claimant is seeking in this matter exceeds the specified contract amount between the Claimant and the Respondent, State of Illinois. This information was acquired from the departmental reports filed by the Illinois Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities and the Illinois Department of Public Aid, State departments or agencies, a copy of which was attached to the Respondent’s motion to dismiss. These reports are considered prima facie evidence pursuant to Rule 14 of the Rules of the Court of Claims. The departmental reports also establish that 2% transfer funds were not available to be used to pay this claim, and the account from which this claim would have been paid has been completely depleted.

Furthermore, this Claimant is not entitled to reimbursement from the Illinois Department of Public Aid medical indigent funds since the individual to whom the Claimant rendered services was receiving treatment not covered by this program. Also, this claim was filed more than one year after the Illinois Department of Public Aid denied the claim which bars it from this Court’s jurisdiction under section 11 — 13 of the Public Aid Code. Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 23, par. 11 — 13.

It is hereby ordered, that this cause be dismissed with prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roe, C.J.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Respondent’s motion to dismiss and the Court being duly advised in the premises:

Finds, that the amount the Claimant is seeking in this matter exceeds the specified contract amount between the Claimant and the Respondent, State of Illinois. This information was acquired from the departmental reports filed by the Illinois Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities and the Illinois Department of Public Aid, State departments or agencies, a copy of which was attached to the Respondent’s motion to dismiss. These reports are considered prima facie evidence pursuant to Rule 14 of the Rules of the Court of Claims. The departmental reports also establish that 2% transfer funds were not available to be used to pay this claim, and the account from which this claim would have been paid has been completely depleted.

Furthermore, this Claimant is not entitled to reimbursement from the Illinois Department of Public Aid medical indigent funds since the individual to whom the Claimant rendered services was receiving treatment not covered by this program. Also, this claim was filed more than one year after the Illinois Department of Public Aid denied the claim which bars it from this Court’s jurisdiction under section 11 — 13 of the Public Aid Code. Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 23, par. 11 — 13.

It is hereby ordered, that this cause be dismissed with prejudice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 871, 1983 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/methodist-medical-center-v-state-ilclaimsct-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack