Metera v. Foster Paving Block Co.

155 N.Y.S. 760
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1915·No. No. 267/2·Published

Opinion

JOHN M. KELLOGG, J.

The right to examine a witness or party before trial is a statutory right, and to obtain it the statutory provisions must be complied with. The Special Term has no power to grant the original order; it must be made by a judge. Code of Civil Procedure, § 873; Heishon v. Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co., 77 N. Y. 278; Wiechers v. New Home Sewing Machine Co., 38 App. Div. 1, 56 N. Y. Supp. 235; Weinstock v. Hallenbeck, 163 App. Div. 966, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1150. The order was therefore improperly granted at Special Term.

We may state that the papers do not sufficiently show the necessity for the examination of the witness Rover, and do not warrant, his examination and the examination of the defendant’s plant. An examination of the plant cannot be obtained by such an order. Perhaps, upon proper facts shown, an inspection of the plant might be permitted under sections 803 to 809 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The order is therefore reversed, with costs.

WOODWARD, J., concurs. SMITH, P. J., and LYON and HOWARD, JJ., concur in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metera v. Foster Paving Block Co., 155 N.Y.S. 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

155 N.Y.S. 760 (Metera v. Foster Paving Block Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heishon v. . Knickerbocker Life Insurance Co.
77 N.Y. 278 (New York Court of Appeals, 1879)
Wiechers v. New Home Sewing Machine Co.
38 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Weinstock v. Hallenbeck
163 A.D. 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Weinstook v. Hallenbeck
148 N.Y.S. 1150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)