Metcalfe (David) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 2020·No. 80291·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DAVID ALAN METCALFE, No. 80291 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, F LED Respondent.

JAN 2 3 21 :0 •

H A. BROM UPREME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for reconsideration. Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; Robert W. Lane, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for reconsideration in a criminal matter, we lack jurisdiction. Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Al4LP J.

Stiglich Silver

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(o) 1947A Do-031AM

Mk MEI SEM cc: Hon. Robert W. Lane, District Judge David Alan Metcalfe Attorney General/Carson City Nye County District Attorney Nye County Clerk

2

171,,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metcalfe (David) Vs. State, (Neb. 2020).

Metcalfe (David) Vs. State (Metcalfe (David) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)
Phelps v. State
900 P.2d 344 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1995)