Metcalfe (David) Vs. State
This text of Metcalfe (David) Vs. State (Metcalfe (David) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DAVID ALAN METCALFE, No. 80291 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, F LED Respondent. JAN 2 3 21 :0 • H A. BROM UPREME COURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for reconsideration. Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; Robert W. Lane, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for reconsideration in a criminal matter, we lack jurisdiction. Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Al4LP J. Stiglich Silver
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(o) 1947A Do-031AM Mk MEI SEM cc: Hon. Robert W. Lane, District Judge David Alan Metcalfe Attorney General/Carson City Nye County District Attorney Nye County Clerk
2 171,,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Metcalfe (David) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metcalfe-david-vs-state-nev-2020.