Metcalf v. State
This text of 244 S.W.2d 818 (Metcalf v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The offense is burglary; the punishment, four years.
No statement of facts accompanies the record.
Bill of Exception No. 1 is to the admission of testimony. There is no showing in the bill as to what the testimony com[576]*576plained of was. The bill does not show that any objectionable testimony was admitted and, therefore, presents nothing for review. Tex. Dig. Crim. Law 1120(4).
Bill of Exception No. 2 seeks to attack the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. We cannot pass upon such a bill without a statement of facts.
What we have said in discussing Bill of Exception No. 2 applies to Bill of Exception No. 3, wherein appellant complains of absence of corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony.
Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 S.W.2d 818, 156 Tex. Crim. 575, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metcalf-v-state-texcrimapp-1952.