Metcalf v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Metcalf v. State

122 S.W.2d 297

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 14, 1938

DocketNo. 20023

StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.W.2d 297 (Metcalf v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metcalf v. State, 122 S.W.2d 297 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for perjury; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged in the indictment and waived a jury upon the trial of the case.

Nothing has been perceived in the record which would authorize a reversal of the conviction. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for perjury; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged in the indictment and waived a jury upon the trial of the case.

Nothing has been perceived in the record which would authorize a reversal of the conviction. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 S.W.2d 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metcalf-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.