Metcalf v. Metcalf
This text of 112 S.E. 828 (Metcalf v. Metcalf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A wife sued for divorce on the grounds of cruel treatment and habitual intoxication. The husband denied these charges. On the issues of fact thus raised the evidence was conflicting. Held:
(а) The court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant the plain till' a new trial.
(б) The court did not err in not submitting to the jury rendering the first verdict, finding against the plaintiff, the question of the grant of permanent alimony to the wife. The grant of temporary alimony is for the [776]*776judge. Civil Code, §§ 2976, 2977, 2979; Gibson v. Patterson, 75 Ga. 549. The grant of permanent alimony is for the jury rendering the second or final verdict. Civil Code, § 2981. In Davis v. Davis, 134 Ga. 804 (68 S. E. 594), there is nothing contrary to what is here ruled. By the final verdict in that case the husband was granted a divorce; and a majority of this court held that, under such circumstances, the court below should have submitted to the jury the question of granting permanent alimony to the wife, the fault of the wife not ipso facto debarring her from permanent alimony.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 S.E. 828, 153 Ga. 775, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metcalf-v-metcalf-ga-1922.