Metcalf v. Masters

Fourth Circuit

Metcalf v. Masters

633 F. App'x 586

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2016·No. No. 15-7524·Published

Opinion

[587] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bradford Metcalf, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district, court. Metcalf v. Masters, No. 1:14-cv-27185, 2015 WL 5031557 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[587] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bradford Metcalf, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district, court. Metcalf v. Masters, No. 1:14-cv-27185, 2015 WL 5031557 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Metcalf v. Masters, 633 F. App'x 586 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

633 F. App'x 586 (Metcalf v. Masters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related