Metcalf v. Chicago Sandoval Coal Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Metcalf v. Chicago Sandoval Coal Co.

211 Ill. App. 31

DecidedApril 5, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 211 Ill. App. 31 (Metcalf v. Chicago Sandoval Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metcalf v. Chicago Sandoval Coal Co., 211 Ill. App. 31 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Damages, § 205* — when instruction is objectionable as failing to limit damages to those alleged in declaration. An instruction, in an action for personal injuries to an employee, which states that plaintiff may recover any damages which he is shown to have sustained, if defendant failed to provide him a safe place to work, is objectionable as failing to limit the damages recoverable to those alleged in the declaration.

McBride, J., took no part on the hearing of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Damages, § 205* — when instruction is objectionable as failing to limit damages to those alleged in declaration. An instruction, in an action for personal injuries to an employee, which states that plaintiff may recover any damages which he is shown to have sustained, if defendant failed to provide him a safe place to work, is objectionable as failing to limit the damages recoverable to those alleged in the declaration.

McBride, J., took no part on the hearing of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 Ill. App. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metcalf-v-chicago-sandoval-coal-co-illappct-1918.