Metcalf v. Call

Fourth Circuit

Metcalf v. Call

584 F. App'x 56

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2014·No. No. 14-1443·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ron David Metcalf appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 & 14141 (2012) without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Metcalf v. Call, No. 2:14-cv-00010-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ron David Metcalf appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 & 14141 (2012) without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Metcalf v. Call, No. 2:14-cv-00010-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Metcalf v. Call, 584 F. App'x 56 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

584 F. App'x 56 (Metcalf v. Call) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related